Table of Contents
- The Balance Between Cross-Functionality and Self-Management
- How Scrum Teams Navigate Collaboration and Accountability
- The Ringelmann Effect: Why Smaller Teams Work Better
- How Cross-Functionality Works in Practice
- 1. Mindset: A Shared Sense of Accountability
- 2. Skill Set: Generalists with a Specialization
- Self-Management: Solving the "How" Questions
Understanding the Key Characteristics of a Scrum Team
A Scrum Team forms the backbone of the Scrum Framework, playing a critical role in achieving product goals and delivering value incrementally. In this blog, we’ll explore what makes a Scrum Team effective, their accountabilities, and the characteristics that set them apart. Let’s dive into the essentials!
Scrum Team
Watch the Video for a Complete Overview!
What Does the Term "Scrum Team" Mean?
When we talk about a Scrum Team, it’s important to understand its structure. A Scrum Team comprises three core accountabilities:
- The Developers
- The Product Owner
- The Scrum Master
A common misconception is that the term “Scrum Team” refers only to Developers. However, both the Product Owner and Scrum Master are equally integral to the Scrum Team. Together, these accountabilities work collaboratively to achieve the Sprint Goal and Product Goal.
Can One Person Hold Multiple Roles?
Interestingly, the Scrum Guide does not mandate that each accountability must be filled by a separate person. Depending on the context and team structure, the same individual can hold multiple accountabilities within one or even several Scrum Teams. This flexibility allows organizations to adapt the Scrum Framework to their unique needs without compromising its core principles.
The Core Characteristics of a Scrum Team
A successful Scrum Team embodies certain characteristics that ensure seamless collaboration and effective delivery. Let’s break them down:
1. A Small Team Size
What does it mean for a Scrum Team to be small? According to the Scrum Guide 2020, a Scrum Team typically consists of 10 or fewer members. However, “typically” doesn’t mean “strictly.”
The ideal size of a Scrum Team depends on factors such as:
- The team’s maturity level
- Prior experience working together
- The complexity of the product or project
- Business requirements
For some teams, “small” might mean eight members, while for others, it could be 12 or slightly more. The key is to ensure the team is small enough to foster communication and collaboration while remaining large enough to meet product goals efficiently.
2. Cross-Functionality
Scrum Teams are cross-functional, meaning team members possess the skills needed to complete their work and understand each other’s contributions.
Think of it as going into battle: if one member goes alone, they might struggle; if the entire team goes together, they can overcome challenges effectively. Cross-functionality encourages knowledge sharing and adaptability, creating a well-rounded team that can handle a variety of tasks.
3. Self-Management
One of the hallmarks of a Scrum Team is self-management. Unlike traditional teams that rely on external managers for direction, Scrum Teams decide who does what and how to achieve their goals.
This doesn’t mean working independently—it’s about collective ownership. A Scrum Team makes decisions collaboratively, guided by:
- The Product Goal
- The Sprint Goal
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Product research and development needs
Self-management empowers teams to be proactive, responsive, and aligned with the organization’s objectives.
The Balance Between Cross-Functionality and Self-Management
Achieving both cross-functionality and self-management isn’t easy—it requires time, trust, and effort. Team members must develop the skills to not only contribute to their specific roles but also support their teammates when needed.
With these characteristics in place, a Scrum Team becomes a cohesive unit capable of navigating challenges and delivering high-value products.
How Scrum Teams Navigate Collaboration and Accountability
In the previous section, we explored the core characteristics of a Scrum Team: small size, cross-functionality, and self-management. Now, let’s dive deeper into how these traits work together in practice and how Scrum Teams overcome common challenges.
The Ringelmann Effect: Why Smaller Teams Work Better
Ever heard of the Ringelmann Effect? In essence, it highlights how individual effort tends to decrease as team size increases. Larger teams often face challenges like communication breakdowns, uneven workload distribution, and reduced accountability.
In smaller Scrum Teams, however, collaboration becomes more streamlined, and accountability is clearer. Each team member has a more visible role, making it easier to ensure everyone contributes equally toward achieving the Product Goal.
How Cross-Functionality Works in Practice
Cross-functionality is more than just a buzzword—it’s a mindset and a skill set that empower Scrum Teams to work cohesively. Let’s break this down into two key aspects:
1. Mindset: A Shared Sense of Accountability
Cross-functionality starts with the right mindset. The Scrum Guide 2020 emphasizes that the entire Scrum Team is accountable for delivering a valuable Increment at the end of each Sprint.
Here’s what this looks like in practice:
- Accountability is shared: The Developers, Product Owner, and Scrum Master are all equally responsible for the team’s success.
- Collaboration is key: Successes and failures are shared, creating a sense of unity. “My win is your win, and my loss is your loss.”
This mindset ensures that team members are aligned with the Product Goal, working together to overcome challenges and deliver value.
2. Skill Set: Generalists with a Specialization
In addition to a shared mindset, cross-functionality requires team members to have generalist skills while maintaining their area of expertise. For example:
- A UI/UX designer might not need to master backend programming, but they should understand how their designs impact backend infrastructure and performance.
- A backend developer might not be an expert in marketing, but they should be aware of how their work affects end-user engagement.
This overlap in understanding allows team members to collaborate more effectively, anticipate challenges, and align their efforts with the Product Goal.
Take the First Step with Art's Scrum Services
Self-Management: Solving the "How" Questions
Self-management is another crucial characteristic of a Scrum Team. Unlike traditional teams with hierarchies or sub-teams, Scrum Teams operate without rigid structures.
Here’s how self-management works in practice:
- Planning and prioritization: Each team member contributes to planning what needs to be done, when, and how.
- Proactive decision-making: Whether it’s stakeholder collaboration, experimentation, or testing, the Scrum Team collectively decides how to address product-related activities.
- Taking initiative: If a quick decision is needed—such as reaching out to a stakeholder or resolving a design dilemma—team members act without waiting for a manager’s approval.
Real-Life Examples of Cross-Functionality and Self-Management
To bring these concepts to life, let’s consider some real-world scenarios:
-
Stakeholder Collaboration: A Scrum Developer working on marketing notices a gap in stakeholder requirements. Instead of waiting for the next Sprint Review, they send a quick email or ask the Product Owner to follow up.
-
Testing During the Sprint: A backend developer finishes a functionality ahead of schedule. Rather than waiting for the Sprint to end, the team initiates testing right away to avoid delays.
-
Resolving Design Questions: A UI designer is torn between two mockups. Instead of seeking external input, they collaborate with team members to make a decision that aligns with the Product Goal.
Overcoming Challenges in Self-Management
Of course, self-management isn’t without its challenges:
- The Product Owner might be juggling multiple teams, making them unavailable for immediate feedback.
- The Scrum Master could be serving multiple teams or even holding other responsibilities.
- Part-time Developers may not always be accessible due to their limited availability.
- Stakeholders might be unavailable due to holidays or other commitments.
Despite these hurdles, self-managing and cross-functional teams find creative solutions to navigate roadblocks and ensure progress.
Why Small Teams Are the Backbone of Success
Small teams reduce the complexity of communication and decision-making. With fewer people, there’s less room for miscommunication and more room for meaningful collaboration. Research consistently shows that smaller groups are more effective at solving problems and innovating because every voice is heard, and everyone plays a vital role.
In Scrum, a team size of 10 or fewer is recommended not as a rigid rule but as a way to foster agility, accountability, and focus. Small teams move faster, adapt quicker, and deliver value more consistently than large groups weighed down by bureaucracy.
Enjoyed this article on Scrum?
Support My Work!
The Power of Cross-Functional Teams
A cross-functional team isn’t just a buzzword—it’s a necessity for delivering high-quality work. Cross-functionality means the team has all the skills required to turn an idea into a valuable increment. It’s about having developers, designers, QA, and even marketers working together towards the same goal.
This diversity ensures that no critical perspective is overlooked, and it breaks down silos that often slow progress. Cross-functional teams are more innovative because they merge different ways of thinking into creative solutions.
Self-Managing Teams: The Key to Autonomy
Self-management is the heart of Scrum teams. When teams are self-managing, they take ownership of their work, plan effectively, and adapt to changing circumstances. This autonomy doesn’t mean chaos—it means accountability.
Self-managing teams make decisions without waiting for external direction. This empowers them to resolve issues faster, collaborate effectively, and stay focused on the Product Goal. In the long run, this autonomy fosters a culture of trust, innovation, and continuous improvement.
Why These Principles Work Together
Small, cross-functional, and self-managing teams are the trifecta for success. Small teams provide focus, cross-functional teams provide the skills, and self-managing teams ensure ownership and accountability. Together, they create an environment where people thrive, products flourish, and value is delivered consistently.
When you combine these principles, you build teams that don’t just work—they excel. They are resilient, adaptable, and capable of solving the complex challenges of modern product development.